The family of former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai has countered allegations made by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) that equipment seized during a recent investigation is linked to unlawful phone-tapping or surveillance. Relatives and legal representatives deny the claim, saying the items in question are not related to any illegal monitoring apparatus.
In a statement released by the family’s legal team on Tuesday, March 3, 2026, lawyers said the suggestion that the equipment confiscated by the ICPC was used for unauthorized interception of communications is “inaccurate, misleading and without factual basis.” They described the claim as a misunderstanding of what the seized items actually are and stressed that they do not constitute surveillance devices.
According to the family’s response, the equipment was taken during an ongoing inquiry by the anti-graft agency but was never intended for any form of phone interception or illegal use. They urged the ICPC to provide clarity on the specific nature of the items and to explain the legal basis for linking them to unlawful activity, warning that public speculation should not be allowed to tarnish El-Rufai’s reputation without clear evidence.
The ICPC had earlier announced that it recovered certain electronic devices believed to be associated with alleged unlawful acts during its investigation into El-Rufai’s conduct in office. In its announcement, the agency referenced the items as part of the materials under review, suggesting they may be relevant to the case. The commission did not immediately respond to the family’s denial.
El-Rufai’s family noted that public perception and media interpretation have played a significant role in shaping narratives surrounding the inquiry, and called on Nigerians to avoid jumping to conclusions until full details are released through proper legal channels. Lawyers said they are prepared to challenge any assertions that do not align with verified information or established fact.
Observers say the dispute highlights broader tensions between public perception and anti-corruption investigations involving high-profile figures, especially when sensitive matters such as alleged interception of communications are mentioned. Critics of the ICPC’s announcement have urged the commission to be transparent about the nature of the evidence and to avoid statements that could be misconstrued before formal legal proceedings take place.
The situation comes as the nation continues to monitor investigations involving prominent political leaders, underscoring the public interest in clarity, fairness and due process in high-stakes inquiries. Both supporters and critics of El-Rufai say that any formal legal process should adhere strictly to the rule of law and ensure that the rights of all parties are respected.
