Former Vice President and presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, has sued President Bola Tinubu at the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking his disqualification from the 2027 presidential election over an alleged forged National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) certificate.
The legal action came on Friday, with Atiku personally appearing at the Federal High Court registry in Abuja to depose to an affidavit supporting the suit filed against Tinubu, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The suit invokes Sections 137(1)(j), 139(1)(a)(i) and 285(14)(c) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, as well as relevant provisions of the Electoral Act 2026.
At the centre of the case is Section 137(1)(j), which provides that a person is not qualified for election as President if he has presented a forged certificate to INEC.
Atiku and the ADC are asking the court to determine whether Tinubu should be disqualified from contesting the 2027 presidential election over the allegation that he submitted a forged NYSC certificate in connection with his presidential candidacy.
According to Atiku’s affidavit, the NYSC discharge certificate allegedly submitted to INEC bears the name “Tinubu Bola Adekunle,” rather than the President’s name, “Bola Ahmed Tinubu.”
The plaintiffs further alleged that Tinubu did not obtain the certificate and that the document was submitted in connection with the 2027 presidential election.
Atiku is also asking the court to compel INEC to produce Tinubu’s Form CF001 submitted in connection with the 2023 and 2027 presidential elections.
The former vice president said he had previously requested Certified True Copies of the relevant documents from INEC but had not received them before commencing the action.
Explaining his decision to personally appear at the court registry, Atiku said the case was too important to be handled casually.
“I came here personally because the issues before the court go to the heart of our Constitution and the integrity of the office of President.
“I have therefore put my name, my signature and my oath behind the facts we are presenting to the court. Now it is President Tinubu’s turn to answer them,” he said.
Atiku said the matter should not be determined through political arguments or social media exchanges but through evidence presented before the judiciary.
“We are not asking Nigerians to decide this matter on social media, and we are not asking INEC to become a court.
“We are asking the institution holding the records to produce them and the judiciary to examine the evidence and pronounce on it,” he said.
The ADC presidential candidate also questioned whether the names appearing on the disputed certificate could legitimately be attributed to Tinubu.
Among the reliefs sought by the plaintiffs is an order disqualifying Tinubu and the APC from participating in the 2027 presidential election if the allegations are established.
Atiku argued that the authenticity of certificates should be subjected to the same standard applicable to every Nigerian.
“The presidency is not an immunity certificate against constitutional scrutiny,” he said.
He also called on INEC to demonstrate its neutrality by producing the relevant electoral records.
Counsel to the plaintiffs, Edwin Inegedu, SAN, and Joseph Onu Silas, expressed confidence in the case.
However, the APC dismissed the suit as an exercise in futility, urging Atiku to prepare for the 2027 election.
Speaking with Saturday PUNCH, the National Secretary of the APC, Ajibola Basiru, said, “Atiku should go and brace for another defeat in the general election. The President is qualified to contest the election; there is nothing disqualifying him, and the matter has been settled by the Supreme Court.”
“Atiku has nothing to offer Nigerians, and he knows that he will be rejected at the poll. That is why he is looking for a shortcut. But there’s no shortcut to power. He should go and mobilise for the poll, where he will be rejected by Nigerians as usual. That will end his political misadventure into the presidency,” he added.
Meanwhile, in Brussels, Belgium, a legal counsel and chieftain of the ADC, Kalu Agu, submitted a petition against Tinubu to the European Commission over the alleged submission of a forged certificate to INEC.
The petition, submitted on Friday, asked the European Commission to intervene over what Agu described as an alleged subversion of Nigeria’s constitutional order.
Agu was captured in a video shared on X by Atiku’s media aide, Paul Ibe, while submitting the petition.
He alleged that Tinubu presented false academic credentials to INEC as part of the constitutional requirements for the 2027 election.
Agu further alleged that Tinubu failed to disclose the primary and secondary schools he attended in documents submitted to INEC.
He argued that the alleged submission of forged certificates contravened Section 137(1)(j) of the 1999 Constitution.
“This is in flagrant violation of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, particularly Section 137(1)(j), which says that if you have presented a forged certificate to INEC, you will not be qualified to run for election. He has submitted forged certificates to INEC, making him unqualified to run in the 2027 general election,” Agu said.
However, the Special Adviser to the President on Policy Communications, Daniel Bwala, dismissed the EU petition, describing it as a distraction by the opposition.
“The opposition is on a wild goose chase in Europe. They would do everything possible to distract and avoid answering the very one question: What would you do differently from this government?” Bwala wrote on X on Friday.
